you know, it's interesting - yesterday was friday the 13th... interestingly enough it turned out to be the most eventful friday the 13th of my life. to those who made it so - thanks. i'll definitely be unable to forget you now!
in any case, i've been sitting here reminiscing... cuz, well, that's what i'm best at, i guess, especially when i feel like being useful - but it's ok, don't worry! my mom will get home tonight and bring out the ol' persian mother's whip and i'll get a few red'uns on my back and be on m'way soon enough!
but while i'm reminiscing...
i was thinking about lauguage. i've been reading this book called Epistle to the Son of the Wolf - really good read, i recommend picking up a copy if you're interested in wolves at all.. and their children...
in any case, the author discusses how words are more powerful than weapons these days. it's quite an interesting concept... there is truth to it as well. we can think about it on the international scale - look at the revolutions of the past 100 years they all began and ended with words. (you can argue otherwise, i know, but consider politics - revolutions in most countries begin with certain charismatic individuals saying that they can do better than the current leader - when the revolution is over, that new leader will make promise after promise.... all words to subdue a people). think about our current elections here in canada. no longer do our leaders duel each other - but they debate and accuse and dance around truth... you'd think that if we really wanted our leaders to have to "keep their promises" we'd have created some kind of contract system.... but we hold them to their "word".
business these days is the same. when a consultant is hired, it's usually over a game of golf or a dinner meeting, and the two companies will "agree" without signing anything. and they're held accountable based on that verbal agreement.
the same when it comes down to individuals around us. why is it that when mr. x says something to mr. y about his mama, mr. y has to respond - fights might even break out! are you kidding?! that sounds kinda ridiculous, no? but it's the truth, and we all know that it's (well, a common joke) a matter of dignity.
and so i was thinking today, do we actually think about what we say to each other.. do we think about what that means and are we ready to be held accountable?
when i was in in gibraltar, one of my biggest problems was that my cousins and i had trouble understanding each other's language - we all speak english, but it was still difficult. and the reason is that words have different meanings, and a different level of importance based on where you come from. this makes sense; language and culture are inextricably intertwined. so when my friend sahar says : my, was the little guy chuffed - i had no clue what she was talking about.... chuffed? what, did he gain weight? no, he was pleased with himself.
now, let's think about this a little. if words are so important, then it must be equally important to choose them with care. now, sometimes, one might say something out of haste - i might yell at my father and tell him: who the heck do you think you are - as opposed to, dearest sir, please kindly inform me regarding your reasons for your statement... etc.
but then you have to wonder - if you make a mistake... be it a little one: get lost, as opposed to please excuse me, or a big one: you are a(n) [insert curse word here]... and you say the wrong thing.. or you say something without thinking... does that make it a lie?
or did you just make a blunder... and like most capitalists, believe that it will all right itself?
i'd take the blunder side, personally... but then... let's tweak this scenario a little.... what if it's something really stupid.. like telling a student that you'll help them.. always saying it. how long should you go on? knowing that you're never going to really do it... a month? two perhaps? three??
no sir... the second it goes from a blunder to a continued charade.. then it's a lie.
don't ya think?
Saturday, January 14, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
ahahhah i LOVED the two statements that are possible to tell your father...ahahah definitely laughed out loud to that one...but as to the actual message of your blog, im still pondering *so i guess yah, some people think before they speak..ahahh but thats because this is online and i have time...if this was a conversation, id say whatever came to me
so if time is a factor - why not just speak slower? and react slower? about a year ago, i realized that the key difference between adults and youth is that youth react instantly... for those of you in chemistry, this is because our Gibb's free energy change is negative... but for our parents, it's the same... you have to put energy INTO the reaction before it will occur... so it takes a lot for them to blow.. now, granted, you can say, but my daddy, he yell at me when i walk in the room! yes, true... but i think you've been putting energy into the reaction for well, at least 10 years! hehehe.. a change in G that is negative however, means that the reaction is spontaneous... so you stick A and B in the same jar... and whabam! C is formed!
and interestingly enough, silence is an attribute of the seeker of truth.
so in other words: think before you speak... and sometimes don't even bother speaking at all.. and you'll probably be better off for it...
i, on the other hand, think but often i'm not clearheaded enough to get my thoughts to say NO to what i'm going to say.. so i'll say it anyway, get a slap in the face (which i'm glad, my friends do give me quite often - especially the menfolk... but then.. some of them should learn to THINK in general...) and well, i'm arrogant enough to get my dignity back and up to a full ego within the hour!
im disgusted by the use of chemistry ahahahha MUST you use it all the time?!?!?! ahahhaha
i'm sure you are.
now go study your SCIENCE homework!
actually, if i may continue on yet another rant...
i do believe that it is quite important to use scientific analogies - only if you know enough to use them properly (which i hope i do!)... it gives the discussion a type of precision and the ideas more focus...
for example, in a quotation we're both familiar with, catalyst is used to describe youth in a certain movement. the nature of a catalyst is that it is not consumed in a reaction - the same must hold true for these youth, right? so, while you may be disgusted with scientific terms in an everday discussion, it is necessary, sometimes, to qualify a point.
however, i do understand that not everyone is familiar with the use of scientific terms, and in fact, with some of my friends, they just stop listening to me once i bring up the word!
perhaps then, this is the way i am most familiar with and so i'll try to go beyond that and "stretch my limits" as it were!
thanks for the light!
eheheh still disgusted....also...science is all theory anyways..ahahha i dont believe in it! *yet somehow, my life has revolved around it...the irony* ahhaha
Post a Comment